What's wrong with this lawyer?!

But there are still some viewers who find it exhilarating!

"Lawyer Tang's words really hit the spot for me. Approval is not just a right, it's also an obligation. Damn it, that bonus wasn't approved for me before, they kept delaying it, and after I resigned, it was never resolved. The world's ravens are truly all black!"

"I agree, these companies deserve to be dealt with. I think there should be regulations that if companies deliberately refuse to approve bonuses without any reason, they should be directly awarded to the workers!"

"I think it should be like this too, otherwise they just drag things out and we have no recourse."

That's actually also Old Tang's idea. Guiding cases are meant to guide, and judges must adhere to guiding cases when encountering similar cases!

In a sense, the effectiveness of guiding cases is similar to those "interpretative regulations" by the Supreme Court.

Judge Song is delighted, and many legal professionals in the live stream are nodding repeatedly.

Because this is indeed a rather real issue; the company plays a dominant role, and if the company keeps delaying bonus approval, what can workers do?

These types of judgments vary greatly, but most are like the first trial verdict in Lüzhou: the bonus wasn't approved even after resigning, and it gets directly dismissed.

But this is obviously legal yet unreasonable, unsettling the balance between rights and obligations.

For lawyers, what everyone likes the most is having regulations!

Even if the regulation isn't great, it's better than having no regulations and relying on the judge to "make discretion."

The "Civil Code" was barely published, and the Supreme Court issued over a hundred judicial interpretations.

This is why they say learning never ends; just these one hundred and twenty-two judicial interpretations, along with over two thousand articles of the Civil Code, you study them slowly, learning them without a word.

Of course, this practice is also criticized by legal individuals.

Some believe that if so many judicial interpretations are needed, why don't you put them all into the law during legislation?

Old Tang finished speaking, and Judge Song turned to Li Zhongda: "Do you have anything to add?"

Li Zhongda hesitated for a long while before speaking: "I believe the other party is wrong in saying, the reason we didn't approve was not because two projects have losses."

He knows Gao Wentang is watching the live stream, so he thinks he should say more.

Law students are like this. Never mind whether they know or agree, they definitely write more, definitely fill up the space for answers.

What if... an extra point is given.

Unlike math, if you don't know, you just don't; if truly incapable, you might only write "solution" and can't write any further.

The key is that he listened to Tang Fangjing just now, and felt... felt that what the other party said made a lot of sense.

Because no matter what, two projects have losses, you can't refuse bonuses for six projects.

So he thought about the dirt the company once splashed on Su Yeping.

Above, Judge Song hesitated for a moment and then said: "So, are you planning to amend your defense?"

Because Li Zhongda previously harped on about losses as the reason for not granting bonuses.

Li Zhongda quickly said: "Not exactly, what I mean is that these two projects have losses because the former head, Su Yeping, had major negligence in their duties."

"Failed to fulfill obligations diligently, concealed key information, engaged in fraud, thus leading to losses in two projects, so City Development Company should not pay any bonuses to Su Yeping."

Old Tang... Old Tang froze for a moment, then quickly grabbed the opposing evidence for a look.

Meanwhile above, Judge Song and two judges were also searching, even the clerk was doing the same, everyone now doubts their memory.

He sounded so certain, could he have submitted relevant evidence before? Otherwise, why speak so confidently?

But after everyone searched for a while, no evidence was found.

Judge Song immediately exclaimed in surprise: "You say it's because the appellant had significant negligence leading to two projects incurring losses—where's your evidence?"

Li Zhongda promptly replied: "Currently there's no evidence submitted..."

Judge Song instantly became furious: "You say this in court without submitting evidence?"

Got him thinking he had missed some evidence; this is live!

The collective flipping through evidence in court confounded some in the live stream until experts came forward to explain.

"So, is this person slandering others without any evidence? Is their brain damaged?" Netizens were astounded.

In the City Development Group office, Director Xiang stood up: "Boss Gao, I have some matters, I'll stop watching."

He felt if he continued to watch, he'd be enraged to a cerebral hemorrhage.

Gao Wentang stood up; although his face was darkened, he still said: "Well, Director Xiang, I'll see you out..."

"No need, I'll go myself."

Director Xiang waited for the leaders to leave, and Gao Wentang exchanged glances with other company leaders in the office, faces all seemingly showing the words "doom."